Friends Album: Photos 32 & 33

Read from the beginning here. **Click on the images below for larger versions**

Photo No. 32 was once again taken by photographer Charles H. Gallup in Poughkeepsie, N. Y.:

Friend No. 32

The imprint on the front of this photo is slightly different from the embossed imprint on the front of Photo No. 26. The imprint on the back is almost exactly the same as that of Photo No. 26, except the print is in red instead of green:

Reverse of Friend No. 32's photo.

I think we’ve seen the subject of Photo No. 33 before (twice!):

Friend No. 33/possibly No. 24

She certainly looks like Friend No. 24:

Friends 33 (left) and 24.

The eyes, nose and chin are all a match to me. Both photos appear to be taken at around the same time period and both were taken in Danbury, Conn., though at different studios. Photo No. 33 is taken at Mrs. J. H. Folsom’s studio — she got a lot of business from these folks! In fact, this is a second photo/view of Friend No. 7! I thought this dress looked familiar, but I didn’t recognize it until I started going through all of the photos again for the spreadsheet I am creating.

[Photos 34 & 35]

Friends Album: Photos 28 & 29

Read from the beginning here. **Click on the images below for larger versions**

Photo No. 28 is similar to one we saw earlier:

Friend No. 28

As with Photo No. 10, this image has an upside-down imprint from Folsom’s studio in Danbury, Conn. This image also has a very grainy texture to it. It almost looks like a drawing, rather than a photograph. There are no other identifying marks on the image.

Photo No. 29 is from still another studio, this time in New Milford, Conn.:

Friend No. 29

I found photographer Walter F. Chipman in city directories on Ancestry. He’s at the Bank Street location in 1888-89 as well as 1891-92. He’s even listed as a photographer at age 17 in the 1880 U.S. Census (though he’s in New Haven then).

[Photos 30 & 31]

—————————————

1880 U.S. Census, New Haven County, Connecticut, population schedule, New Haven, page 372, dwelling 379, family 510, Walter F. Chipman; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 23 March 2011); Roll: 105; Family History Film 1254105; Page: 372A; Enumeration District: 74; Image: 0286.

New Milford Directory, 1888-89 and 1891-92, Walter F. Chipman; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 23 March 2011).

New Tools for the Friends Album

I’m almost halfway through with blog posts about the 75* people featured in the Friends Album. I felt I needed to do two things to better wrap my head around these folks, where they’re from and how they are connected.

Firstly, I created yet another map in Google Maps, showing the locations for each of the friends featured so far (previously, I created a map showing the locations of the photographers I’ve found in Danbury, Connecticut). The photos were taken in New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts. A large number were taken in Danbury, Connecticut. Yonkers, New York, and New Milford, Connecticut, also were the sites of several photos each.

Friends Album Photo Location Google Map (links to Google Map)

It’s good to see the geographic dispersal of these photos, but I wanted a way to more intricately compare the data I’ve compiled from each image. I next created a Google spreadsheet that shows (where known) the names, locations, approximate dates, ages, photo types and assorted notes, along with thumbnail images for each photo.

Friends Album Google Doc Spreadsheet (links to spreadsheet)

I still have to go through and try all of the different sorts and filters available to me now that I’ve populated this with data. I’m trying to figure out if I can link the thumbnail images to their larger versions on the web. I’ll continue to update the spreadsheet as I investigate each photo. The link provided here will automatically update with my changes. I invite folks to check out both of these tools and let me know if you notice any patterns that I might be missing.

* Originally, I counted 75 people in the album, but now have found a couple of people with more than one photo included. As of now, the number of distinct individuals is probably closer to 70.

Friends Album: Photos 24 & 25

Read from the beginning here. **Click on the images below for larger versions**

I’ve been on hiatus for a few days while traveling, but I’m diving back into the Friends Album.

Friend No. 24 is another lovely young lady:

Friend No. 24

The photographer’s imprint was a bit hard for me to decipher, but I made out the last name Smith and was able to find photographer Frank G. Smith in an 1894 Danbury city directory on Ancestry. I eventually found him there from 1889 through at least 1897. His addresses were listed as 247 Main (1889; one-time Wynard’s studio), 197 Main (1894; one-time Osborne studio), 201 1/2 Main (1896) and 407 Main (1897). I’ve added these to my Danbury photographers Google Map.

As to the girl pictured, I think she may be related to Friend No. 23 (and possibly Friend No. 22). Her features, especially her eyes, are very similar to the girl pictured in Photo No. 23.

Friends 23 (left) & 24

Also, check out how Friends 22-24 are grouped in the album (I wonder if Friend No. 22, Mary Morris [pictured in the loose photo], is somehow related to these ladies):

Friends 22-24 in the album.

Photo No. 25 is not a scan because I could not remove it from the album without harming it and I didn’t want to scan the entire album page, because the album itself is fragile.

Friend No. 25 (Geo. Y.)

Since I couldn’t take out his photo, I’m unable to read the back of Friend No. 25’s cabinet card, but someone before us was helpful enough to write his name in the bottom left on the front of the photo. It looks like “Geo. Y.” George Young, perhaps?

I’ve found two George Youngs, so far, in my searching. One was born in 1919 (and the grandson of Fred Young), and can be ruled out since I believe this photo was taken way earlier than that. The other was born in 1871 and was the son of Stanley Young.

[Photos 26 & 27]

———————————————-

1880 U.S. Census, Fairfield County, Connecticut, population schedule, Danbury, page 35, dwelling 248, family 352, George E. Young and family; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011); Roll: 94; Family History Film 1254094; Page: 76C; Enumeration District: 112; Image: 0152.

1930 U.S. Census, Fairfield, Connecticut, population schedule, Newtown, page 2A, dwelling 38, family 39, George R. Young and family; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 22 March 2011); Roll: 258; Page: 2A; Enumeration District: 145; Image: 288.0.

Crofutt’s Danbury City Directory, 1891, Frank G. Smith, p 212; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 22 March 2011).

Crofutt’s Danbury City Directory, 1894, Frank G. Smith, p 212; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 22 March 2011).

Danbury, Connecticut Directories, 1889, Frank G. Smith;  Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 22 March 2011).

Friends Album: Photos 22 & 23

Read from the beginning here. **Click on the images below for larger versions**

Photo No. 22 offers some nice clues:

Friend No. 22 (aka Mary Morris)
Reverse side of Friend No. 22’s (Mary Morris’) photo

So, we have a photo of Mary Morris, taken in New Milford, Conn., by photographer S. C. Landon. An 1865 tax assessment document lists the photographer in New Milford. I find that interesting for two reasons: 1) That’s pretty early to be in the photography business; 2) Mary’s dress reminded me of Civil War-era clothing.

Looky here! I found a Seth C. Landon in New Milford, Conn., in the 1850 U.S. Census. And look what his job is:

Seth C. Landon, Daguerreotype Artist

We have our man. But he didn’t stay in photography forever:

1884-5 City Directory Ad

I haven’t definitively found Mary Morris yet, but I have a few leads.

Photo No. 23:

Friend No. 23

She’s a beauty, isn’t she? I’m wondering if the white dress and corsage mean this is a wedding portrait? No inscription to identify her. Here’s the imprint on the back:

Imprint on the reverse of Friend No. 23's photo.

I found Edward C. Betts, photographer, in Bridgeport, Conn., in the 1880 U.S. census and directory listings for him in 1890 and 1891.

[Photos 24 & 25]

—————————–

1850 U.S. Census, Litchfield County, Connecticut, population schedule, Litchfield, page 269, dwelling 260, family 285, Seth C. Landon; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 16 March 2011); Roll: M432_42; Page: 268B; Image: 535.

1865 U.S. IRS Tax Assessment List, District 4, S.C. Landon; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 14 March 2011).

1880 U.S. Census, Fairfield County, Connecticut, population schedule, Bridgeport, page 10, dwelling 66, family 98, Edward C. Betts; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 16 March 2011); Roll: 95; Family History Film 1254095; Page: 673B; Enumeration District: 137; Image: 0788.

Bridgeport, Connecticut Directories, 1890-91, Edward C. Betts; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 16 March 2011).

New Milford Directory 1884-5, Seth Landon; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 14 March 2011).

Friends Album: Photos 17 & 18

Read from the beginning here. **Click on the images below for larger versions**

Photo No. 17 tries to be tricky:

Friend No. 17

Although the signature on the front says Newburgh, N.Y., the back of the photo tells the full story:

Stamp on the reverse of Friend No. 17's photo

This photo was taken in Danbury, Conn. But this is still another photography studio! I found a Frederick Borman, photographer in a 1912-13 directories in Danbury, Conn. He has an ad in the same directories and the address for the studio is 242 Main Street (that’s the same address as Charles Blackman’s studio!). However, the ad doesn’t have the full name of the partnership featured in the photo above.

Still, those dates fit the time period for this photo, which I think is taken later than most, if not all, of the photos we’ve seen so far from this album. The crispness of the details and the child’s dress lead me to think this. On that subject, I think it is a boy pictured, though I’m still trying to figure out his outfit. It looks like it’s half-way between a sailor suit and a dress.

On to Photo No. 18:

Friend No. 18 aka William Morrell

We’re back at Mrs. Folsom’s* studio for this photo, which has a very helpful inscription on the back:

Reverse side of Friend No. 18's (William Morrell's) photo

I send a thank-you to the helpful inscriber of this photo — what a wealth of information! Not only do we have the subject’s name, but his location and a relationship to a Mrs. Stanley Young. Maybe she and her husband are related to Fred Young?

I found a Stanley M. Young in Danbury, Conn., in 1880 and 1900. His wife was Mary L. I separately searched for a William Morrell in Bridgewater, Conn., and found one at age 2 in 1860. There was a Mary L. in the household. I found William and his other sister Emma living with a different family in 1870. I haven’t been able to find more records that are definitely associated with William.

I did follow Stanley M. Young forward to 1910, when he was a widower living with his daughter, her husband and their daughter. Her name was Alpha Margaret Ballard.

*Whilst looking for photographer Borman, I found a photographer in the employ of Mrs. Folsom’s studio:

[Photos 19-21]

——————————————-

1860 U.S. Census, Litchfield County, Connecticut, Bridgewater, page 21, dwelling 179, family 180, William Morrell; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011); Roll M653_82; Page 607; Image 22; Family History Library Film: 803082.

1870 U.S. Census, New Haven County, Connecticut, Southbury, page 14, dwelling 126, family 127, William Morrell; FamilySearch (www.familysearch.org : accessed 13 March 2011).

1880 U.S. Census, Fairfield County, Connecticut, population schedule, Danbury, page 35, dwelling 248, family 352, Stanley M. Young and family; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011); Roll: 94; Family History Film 1254094; Page: 76C; Enumeration District: 112; Image: 0152.

1900 U.S. Census, Fairfield County, Connecticut, population schedule, Danbury, page 9, dwelling 164, family 219, Stanley M. Young and family; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011); Roll: T623_132; Page 9B; Enumeration District: 54.

1910 U.S. Census, Fairfield County, Connecticut, population schedule, Danbury, page 9, dwelling 152, family 212, Stanley M. Young; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011); Roll: T624_129; Page: 9A; Enumeration District: 0063; Image: 1120; FHL Number: 1374142.

1910 U.S. Census, Fairfield County, Connecticut, population schedule, Danbury, page 9, dwelling 152, family 212, A. Margaret Ballard; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011); Roll: T624_129; Page: 9A; Enumeration District: 0063; Image: 1120; FHL Number: 1374142.

1920 U.S. Census, Fairfield County, Connecticut, population schedule, Danbury, page 15, dwelling 292, family 369, Alpha Margaret Ballard; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011); Roll: &625_174; Page: 15A; Enumeration District: 97; Image 223.

1930 U.S. Census, Fairfield County, Connecticut, population schedule, Danbury, page 19A, dwelling 340, family 454, Alpha M. Ballard; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011); Roll: 257; Page 19A; Enumeration District: 102; Image 71.

Crofutt’s Danbury City Directory, 1897, S. Burt Johnston. Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011).

U.S. City Directories, Danbury, Connecticut, 1912, Frederick Borman, p 70 and 120; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011).

U.S. City Directories, Danbury, Connecticut, 1913, Frederick Borman, p 67 and 120; Ancestry.com (www.ancestry.com : accessed 13 March 2011).